Review Detail
(Updated: February 24, 2016)
3.0 |
||
| Average Attendee Rating | ||
| Poor | Average | Excellent |
a bit dry and did not agree with the analysis very subjective and I did not see where/how the time periods were selected and saw no evidence presented to indicate we would have any reason to believe the observations would persist going forward - MPT seems to refute these conclusions.
Was this review helpful to you?
Comments
Ordering
