Trade Associations
Financial Services Institute Clarifies Its Use Of "Independent Financial Advisor," Stance On RIA SRO
Wednesday, August 10, 2011 23:02

Tags: financial advisor | independent broker-dealers

A4A readers were a bit perplexed to hear about how the Financial Services Institute -- the umbrella group for independent broker-dealers -- is staking its claim in the industry. So I asked them to clarify.

This Website Is For Financial Professionals Only


 

FSI spokesman Chris Paulitz knew exactly where I was coming from when I said RIAs were pondering the group's mandate.

 

Regarding why the FSI bills itself as an organization for "independent financial advisors," his answer was straightforward: most of the members are hybrid RIA/reps.

 

"We use the term 'independent financial advisor' because the majority of our financial advisor members are dual registered as registered representatives and investment adviser representatives," he says.

 

I know a few of you are skeptical about exactly how these dual registered types operate in practice, but there it is. I've seen plenty of financial planners who offer both fee- and commission-based service "in order to reach a broader range of clients."

 

Now as for why the FSI has lobbied to move RIA supervision to a self-regulatory organization (SRO) like FINRA, Paulitz says it's to protect investors and ultimately, for the industry's own good:

 

"We support a harmonized fiduciary standard of care and SRO for advisors because we believe these changes will result in uniform investor protection whether investors choose to work with registered representatives or investment advisors.  Currently, the average RIA is only examined once every 11 years. If all advisors are regulated by the same SRO, investors will be able to feel more confident in the industry, and that will be a win-win for advisors and investors."

 

Granted, most of his members are already in FINRA anyway, so combining their advisory regulation with their broker-dealer regulation would simplify things enormously for them.

 

But the logic here is client-centric. Can foes of the SRO make a similar case for remaining under the SEC, from the client's point of view?

 

I'm sure there's one out there. I just haven't heard it lately.

 

 

 

Read more...
 
LPL Throws Its Advisors' Weight Behind The Financial Services Institute
Tuesday, August 09, 2011 12:01

The independent broker-dealer group that has come out in favor of registered investment advisors moving to FINRA supervision just got a very powerful friend in the industry.

This Website Is For Financial Professionals Only


 

LPL has signed up all of its 12,600 broker affiliates to a free year of membership in the Financial Services Institute.

 

FSI is presumably already aligned with LPL's goals -- it's run by Bill Dwyer, who just happens to be LPL's head of marketing -- so this largely just beefs up the group's membership.

 

LPL reps get access to FSI communications and analysis of breaking regulatory topics. 

 

The move represents a fairly significant expenditure on LPL's part. Next year, its reps who choose to remain members will have to pay a discounted $99 a year to stay in the group, so we are looking at over $1.2 million in membership fees here.

 

Dwyer says the group is the only one focused on "the industry-wide advocacy needs of independent financial advisors" and that the stronger relationship is designed to "protect" advisors' ability to stay in business, regardless of compensation model.

 

Read more...
 
New Trade Group For Minority Advisors Gears Up For Launch By 4Q
Sunday, August 07, 2011 23:40

Tags: investment advisors

In a few months, there should be an all-new networking group for advisors of color to share best practices, network, and otherwise help each other's careers in a largely white industry.

This Website Is For Financial Professionals Only


 

George Clarke of Silver Spring, Maryland, is putting the finishing touches on the charter of a group he calls the National Association of Minority Retail Registered Representatives and Financial Advisors.

 

The group will reportedly roll out in the next few months. 

 

Clarke knows firsthand the value of cooperation in the industry. He previously worked at Edward Jones and then spent five years with J.P. Turner, only to leave that firm -- and his book -- in 2007.

 

Since then, he's slowly been rebuilding his business back to an AUM of around $1 million as an affiliate of W.R. Rice.

 

The group looks like it will have a somewhat broader umbrella than the existing Association of African American Financial Advisors, which doesn't publicize the number of members it currently has.

 

In theory, Clarke's group could reach out to Asian and Latin advisors as well.

 

As yet, it looks like the acronym for the group will be NAMRRRFA. Just a suggestion to save my typing fingers: since most registered reps are happy to call themselves "advisors" these days, how about just NAMFA?


Read more...
 
NAIFA Backs FINRA Examination Of SEC-Registered Investment Advisers
Friday, July 29, 2011 14:50

Tags: broker-dealers | Dodd-Frank | financial planning | investment advisors | registered investment advisors | SRO

It should come as no surprise that the Board of Trustees of the National Association of Insurance and Financial Advisors (NAIFA) unanimously recommended that the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) serve as the self-regulatory organization (SRO) to conduct examinations of Securities and Exchange Commission-registered investment advisers.

 

"NAIFA believes the most efficient, cost-effective answer is to authorize FINRA to conduct all RIA exams," says the trade group's press release. "FINRA is already subject to SEC oversight, and it would be easier for FINRA to expand its current, substantial examination capabilities to cover RIAs than it would be to establish new SROs or significantly increase SEC exam programs."

 

NAIFA says it represents the interests of approximately 200,000 agents and their associates nationwide, whose practices focus on  life insurance and annuities, health insurance and employee benefits, multiline, and financial advising and investments. The organization in 1999 changed its name from the National Association of Life Underwriters. 

This Website Is For Financial Professionals Only


 
SIFMA Suggests The Labor Department Rethink Its Fiduciary Rules
Wednesday, July 27, 2011 11:56

Tags: fiduciaries | SIFMA

Having made its case on the topic of whether brokers should be given the same fiduciary responsibility as RIA reps, lobbying group SIFMA is now sparing few niceties blasting the Labor Department's fiduciary rules.

This Website Is For Financial Professionals Only


 

The group -- which largely represents broker-dealers -- suggests that the latest regs on advisors who work with retirement accounts "must be withdrawn and re-proposed" to make exemptions for commission-based advisors.

 

Ken Bentsen of SIFMA warned a House panel that failure to make an exemption would put 7 million relatively small IRA accounts that are currently managed on a commission basis at risk.

 

He says advisors will dump these clients as no longer worth the effort.

 

One question: if the commission streams on an IRA with $5,000 in it are currently attractive, how much are these accounts trading?

Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 9 of 13

Login

Banner
Banner
Banner

Comments

Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner

Reviews