Compliance
SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro To Step Down In Three Weeks
Monday, November 26, 2012 16:02

Tags: sec

After nearly four years in office, SEC Chairman Mary L. Schapiro today announced that she will step down on Dec. 14, 2012. Schapiro served as chair through one of the most turbulent times in financial history.  It's rare for the SEC chair to serve more than four years and Schapiro for months had reportedly told those close to her she was exhausted, having served at a time when the agency was held in low regard after the lax regulation that led up up the financial crisis.

This Website Is For Financial Professionals Only


While much work remains to be done before the SEC can reclaim its once respected reputation, the agency in each of the past two years brought more enforcement actions than ever before, including 735 enforcement actions in fiscal year 2011 and 734 actions in FY 2012. (SEC Press Release)

While no clear successor to Ms. Schapiro has been publicly discussed by the Obama admnistration,  The New York Times is reporting that Mary J. Miller, a senior Treasury Department official, is under consideration for the job. Others reportedly in the running: Sallie L. Krawcheck, a former top executive at Citigroup and Bank of America and SEC enforcement chief, Robert Khuzami

.

 

Read more...
Financial Stability Oversight Council Proposes Three Alternative Structures For Money Market Funds And Puts Them Out For Comment
Wednesday, November 14, 2012 13:32

Tags: mutual funds | New Rules | regulation

The Financial Stability Oversight Council decided to open to public comment changes it plans to make in money market funds.
 
It is proposing three alternatives to the current structure.

This Website Is For Financial Professionals Only


 
One would be to allow net asset values (NAV) to float by removing the special exemption that currently allows money funds to use either amortized cost accounting or penny rounding to maintain a stable value.
 
A second option would keep the stable NAV but require a buffer with a tailored amount of assets up to 1% to absorb daily NAV fluctuations.
 
The buffer would require that 3% of an account holder’s highest account value over $100,000 during the previous 30 days would be made available on a delayed basis. This account value amount is called the minimum balance at risk.
 
A third option would include both the stable NAV and the buffer but also would add other loss-absorption capacity to enhance the buffer’s effectiveness and possibly increase the resiliency of money market funds.
 
These other measures could include more stringent diversification requirements, increased minimum liquidity requirements, and more robust disclosure statements.
 
You can see more detail about the proposed changes here.

Read more...
Don Trone Weighs In On Whether CFPs Who Work For Broker/Dealers Can Adhere to CFP Board’s Fiduciary Standard
Monday, October 01, 2012 18:03

Tags: fiduciaries

Don Trone, widely considered the founding father of the fiduciary movement among private wealth advisors, is known for saying what he thinks. So I asked his opinion about the very public disagreement between Kevin Keller, the head of the CFP Board, and Allan Roth, a CFP and blogger for The Wall Street Journal. Trone, the founder and CEO of 3ethos, which trains fiduciaries, did not hold back.

This Website Is For Financial Professionals Only


“There are three elements that stand out,” says Trone. First, he says, whenever a professional is licensed to use a professional designation, he is implicitly asking the public to put more trust in him than someone with no designation, which gives rise under common law to a fiduciary obligation.

 

Secondly, since July 1, 2008, CFP certificants have been subject to a fiduciary standard. “I’ve been told that there is language which permits the certificant to opt out of the fiduciary standard if certain conditions exist,” Trone says. “On the other hand, you have a statement from Kevin Keller which appeared recently on a blog: ‘The CFP Board is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit whose mission is to benefit the public and we take that charge seriously by being the only financial planning designation that requires and enforces a fiduciary standard of care.’  

 

“Kevin doesn’t mention any exceptions, so I guess we can assume the fiduciary standard applies to all CFP certificants at all times,” says Trone.

 

Lastly, the CFP Board is publicly advocating a fiduciary standard; in its advocacy, it doesn’t mention allowing CFPs to opt out, Trone says.

 

When you consider these three elements collectively, Trone says you must come to the conclusion that the fiduciary standard applies to all CFP certificants, no matter whether that are registered reps or investment adviser reps.  “Which brings up the logical follow-on question,” says Trone. “What is the CFP Board’s fiduciary standard?”

 

A standard, says Trone, is defined by “principles and practices, and often times includes safe harbor procedures to insulate a professional or an organization from the unintended consequences of applying a particular standard.”

 

The CFP Board has done an excellent job of communicating the principles of a fiduciary standard that a client’s interest comes first but, says Trone, “I don’t believe they have published anything on the associated practices.”

 

On behalf of the FPA, Trone says he took a stab at aligning fiduciary practices with the six-step financial planning process and, in turn, the CFP Board’s practice standards. “Unfortunately, we can’t get the CFP Board to approve the work for CE because it is considered practice management, has proprietary content, and references leadership behaviors,” says Trone.

 

(By the way, if any CFP certificant would like a copy of the “banned-in-Boston” fiduciary standard Trone prepared for financial planners, This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it . He’ll send it to you. “It will arrive,” he jokes, “in a brown wrapper.”

On a related note, Trone says advisors didn’t score very well in implementing practices associated with a fiduciary standard according to the 2012 Fiduciary Impact Survey. Yes, they scored well on the principles, but not the practices, Trone says.

Financial planners, as a practice area, didn’t score as well as other practices areas, such as retirement advisors and wealth managers. “To the CFP Board’s defense, we did not ask respondents to identify their professional designations, so there is no way of knowing whether CFP certificants would have scored higher,” Trone says. “Next year (this will be an annual survey) we will include designations so we’ll be able to isolate the scores of CFPs vs. other designations and practice areas.”

 

As for whether those who hold the CFP and who work for a brokerage firm could comply with the CFP Board’s fiduciary standard, Trone says the answer is yes, but. “The issue for the organization is whether the certificant’s fiduciary acknowledgement might blow a fiduciary circuit breaker elsewhere in the factory,” Trone says. “This is the reason why a fiduciary safe harbor is so critical, and why the B/Ds are not going to budge on a uniform fiduciary standard until they get one – and I can’t blame them. There are too many unknowns associated with adopting a uniform standard.”

 

So, this is what Trone would propose as a fiduciary safe harbor procedure:

  • The firm must define minimum qualifications (in terms of experience, licensing and training) for advisors who wish to serve in a fiduciary capacity;
  • The advisor must accept and acknowledge their fiduciary status in writing;
  • When serving in a fiduciary capacity, the advisor must agree to only utilize investment products, data bases, software and technology approved by the firm;
  • The advisor must agree to maintain records which demonstrate the advisor's procedural prudence (the details of the advisor's decision-making process); and
  • The activities of the advisor must be monitored by the firm. 
Read more...
Another Advisor Claiming To Be A Fiduciary Accused Of Defrauding Investors
Sunday, September 30, 2012 21:50

Tags: compliance | fiduciaries | fraud | RIA compliance | sec

Another RIA and its owner that were recently charged by the Securities and Exchange Commission with running a Ponzi scheme made the fiduciary obligation to clients the central focus of its marketing.

This Website Is For Financial Professionals Only


 

 Summit Wealth Management Inc., which claimed to manage more than $500 million and 2,200 client accounts, placed the following statement in the second of its home page in bold text: We acknowledge a fiduciary responsibility to you, the client, and as such, we pledge to place your needs first in all that we do.”
 
 

According to the SEC complaint, Summit’s founder and CEO, Angelo Alleca, created Summit Fund, a private fund, no later than 2004 and sold interests in Summit Fund to the advisory clients of Summit Wealth. Investors in Summit Fund were told that it would operate as a fund-of-funds. In or around 2006, although the investors in Summit Fund had been told that the fund would operate as a fund-of-funds, Alleca began actively trading securities in Summit Fund and incurred substantial losses.”

 
Alleca and RIA, the SEC says, concealed the losses from the investors. Around 2006 through 2008, Alleca started at least two additional private funds, called Asset Fund and Credit Fund, to raise capital so that he could cover up the losses that he had incurred in Summit Fund.
 
“Alleca's plan to cover up the losses did not work, however, in that the successive funds incurred further losses,” the SEC complaint says. “Summit Wealth issued such false account statements to approximately 200 of its advisory clients, and the Alleca-Controlled Funds issued such false account statements to the investors in the respective funds. Alleca caused some of the monies that were invested in Asset Fund and Credit Fund to be misappropriated in order to satisfy requests by certain investors in the Summit Fund for redemptions of some or all of their interests in the Summit Fund.”
 
Efforts to contact Alleca for his response to the allegations were unsuccessful.
 
While Summit’s website is no longer live on the Web, according to an archive of it website in November 2010, the firm has six offices, including locations in Beverly Hills, Naples, and Chicago as well as Atlanta. None of the firm’s other advisors, which include a CPA, CFP. NAPFA-Registered Adviser and other professionals, have been charged with any wrongdoing. (I know individuals connected to this firm and it's hard to believe they'd ever knowingly be involved in a fraud.)  
 
While almost unheard of a decade ago, fraud allegations against fee-only advisors claiming to be fiduciaries has become common in the last few years, as the government considers creating a new financial advice regulatory system and doing business as an RIA has become more popular.  
 
 

 

 

Read more...
FINRA Considers Proposal Mandating Greater Consumer Access To BrokerCheck Through Web Links
Monday, September 24, 2012 11:43

Tags: broker-dealers | FINRA | registered reps | regulation

FINRA has drafted a proposal mandating that broker-dealer websites contain a link to its BrokerCheck system. The proposed amendment would also cover any website maintained by or on behalf of anyone associated with of member firms.

This Website Is For Financial Professionals Only


 
The move makes it clear that FINRA wants consumers to have greater awareness of and access to BrokerCheck. FINRA is also weighing what additional information should be included on the public database.
 
There was considerable pushback in February of 2012 on an effort to include broker test scores. So much so that FINRA chief Richard Ketchum declared in May that FINRA had no interest in collecting such data.
 
But investment-related civil actions brought by a state or foreign regulatory body against those associated with a suit that has been dismissed because a settlement agreement was reached may become permanent information on BrokerCheck records.
 
Currently, many of the 4379 FINRA licensees provide no links to BrokerCheck, nor do broker profiles listed by firms.
 
BrokerCheck shows work profiles and regulatory histories of both current and former registered reps and broker-dealers.
 
FINRA has been searching for ways to better inform investors about broker and firm regulatory histories to equip investors with improved due diligence capability.

 

Read more...
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Page 8 of 57

Login

Banner
Banner
Banner

Comments

Banner
Banner
Banner
Banner