I’m Not Worried About Outliving My Money, I’m Worried About My Wife Outliving Hers

Saturday, June 29, 2013 13:13
edit
I’m Not Worried About Outliving My Money, I’m Worried About My Wife Outliving Hers

Tags: retirement | retirement income | retirement planning | reverse mortgages

 

When I retired at age 60, I did not worry about outliving my money. Instead, I worried about my money outliving me. I never expected to live to be 65 or 70– no way 75. At 82, I still am not worried about outliving my money. Thanks to income generated from a timely real estate sale and two subsequent purchases, I’m pretty much assured sufficient income for the rest of my life.

This Website Is For Financial Professionals Only



What I am worried about, however, is that my wife may outlive her money. At 68, she’s 14 years younger than me. When we were married almost 34 years ago, our age difference didn’t seem like much of a big deal. I was 48 and she was 34. We both were healthy and had no medical issues. My wife still doesn’t have any major medical issues, but I do. I have heart disease, diabetes, high blood pressure and sleep apnea.

When you’re young, you typically do not worry about old-age health issues. I certainly did not, because I didn’t think I would live to be very old.

Well, hello 82!

In all probability I will pre-decease my wife. Her Social Security income will drop, but her house and car insurance, property taxes, homeowner association (HOA) fees and other fixed expenses will not; instead, many of these expenses (especially property taxes as the housing industry continues to improve) likely will increase. And, of course, automobile insurance rates increase as you grow elderly. Plus, HOA fees almost always go up, not down. Did you ever hear of food, travel and entertainment expenses decreasing over time? Silly question, huh?

We always have weighed our expenses versus our income, and have lived faithfully within our budgetary guidelines. If an unexpected expense occurs, we look for ways to cut future spending in order to balance out before year’s end. If an unexpected expense occurs near the end of a calendar year, we carry it over to the next year and work to offset it then.

So far, this planning has worked well for us. It also helps that we are debt-free (and have been for nine years) and do not have to spend budgeted income for interest charges. Such charges are tremendous for big-ticket items such as home mortgages, car payments, credit cards, furniture purchases, etc.
But things will change for my wife – or me for that matter if she should go first – when I die.
We spent all of the funds in my IRA account years ago, soon after I retired. We did not touch her IRA, however, until after she retired, also at age 60.

Her IRA suffered substantial losses during the housing bubble burst in 2007 and credit crisis in 2009. These two events caused her to place her remaining funds in a safe haven, but one where it undergoes practically no growth. M wife and I both are victims of the old-age, no-investment-risk-tolerance dilemma.
 
My wife says if she finds herself feeling in danger of outliving her money, she will consider a reverse mortgage on our home, which we own 100%.

As defined on the Internet, a reverse mortgage is a loan for senior homeowners, which uses the home’s equity as collateral. The loan generally does not have to be repaid until the last surviving homeowner permanently moves out of the property or passes away.

To be eligible for a reverse mortgage, the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) requires that all homeowners be at least age 62. The home must be owned free and clear or all existing liens must be satisfied with proceeds from the reverse mortgage. These requirements would be no problem for my wife.

Generally speaking, a reverse mortgage loan cannot be outlived and will not become due, as long as at least one homeowner lives in the home as his or her primary residence, continues to pay the required property taxes and homeowners insurance and maintains the home in accordance with FHA requirements. Again, hopefully, no problem

In the event of death or in the event that the home ceases to be the primary residence for more than 12 months, the homeowner’s estate can choose to repay the reverse mortgage loan or put the home up for sale.

If the equity in the home is higher than the balance of the loan when the home is sold to repay the loan, the remaining equity belongs to the estate.

If the sale of the home is not enough to pay off the reverse mortgage, the lender must take a loss and request reimbursement from the FHA. No other assets are affected by a reverse mortgage. For example, investments, second homes, cars, and other valuable possessions cannot be taken from the estate to pay off a reverse mortgage.

The amount that is available generally depends on four factors: age (older is better), current interest rate, appraised value of the home and government-imposed lending limits.

Reverse mortgages aren’t good for everyone, and may have considerable downsides. Anyone considering a reverse mortgage should seek counseling.
 
While some reverse mortgages are touted as fee-free, there’s no such thing as a free lunch, or one without strings attached. Insurance charges, high interest rates and other kinds of charges can take a big slice of the reverse mortgage pie. And the situation only gets more complicated if the reverse mortgage holder has to go into a nursing home for 12 months or more.

I hope my wife does not have to obtain a reverse mortgage —she wants to leave as much as she possibly can to her three sons—and can live out her life on her available funds.

Then I could rest in peace.

 

Comments (0)

Write comment

You must be logged in to post a comment. Please register if you do not have an account yet.

busy