What Is Suitable?

 
 
Suppose a product passes some other suitability test, but it turns out that I would have decided not to buy it if you had given me additional information. Are you going to tell me that the product is suitable for me when I say that I don’t want it? I’ll just laugh at you.
 
The consumer must be the final arbiter of what is suitable and what is not. We don’t need imposed suitability standards. We need checklists of things that can cause decisions to change. (Note to self: Read Atul Gawande’s The Checklist Manifesto. This book sounds useful.)
 
Consider these three cases:
 
Case #1
 
In 1991 a member of the Society of Actuaries Task Force for Research on Life Insurance Sales Illustrations explained why they didn’t use focus groups to find out what consumers think about sales illustrations:
 
“I'll respond briefly to the suggestion that we use focus groups to get the consumer point of view. We did consider that early on in our work and rejected it for a couple of reasons. One was the time constraints we were under and the cost of doing focus groups. But probably the most important reason is that if you get 15 people in a room who are recent purchasers of life insurance and then spend an hour or two dissecting the sales process and the use of their illustrations in that sales process, you’re likely to have 13 people coming out slightly or greatly disillusioned over what they just did. We found that our field force and our marketing department didn’t like that idea at all.”
 
Case #2
 
Several years ago a client asked me to review a whole life policy issued by a large mutual company. During the review, I explained that his policy values would be higher if the agent had used a lower-commission blend of whole life, term and paid-up additions. He was so angry about this that he contacted the Connecticut attorney general’s office.
 
Case #3
 
With some no-lapse universal life policies, you’re throwing your money away if you follow the illustrated premium schedule. You can get the same lifetime guarantee at a lower cost by using the mechanics of the no-lapse feature to your advantage.
 
In each case, the buyer’s decision seems fragile; additional information could easily cause the decision to change. And yet, can you imagine a suitability standard that these three cases would not pass?
 
Efforts to define suitability may be well-intentioned, but they seem to be ineffective at promoting robust consumer decisions. Even worse, they can give legitimacy to sales practices that only pay lip service to informed decision-making.
 
What do suitability standards really accomplish? Their main result seems to be that they let regulators think that they’ve done something to protect consumers, while not gumming up the wheels of commerce too much.
 
The good news is that some suitability guidelines can provide a starting point for developing useful checklists. Charles L. Ratner’s “The Estate Planner’s Guide To Product Suitability” in the January 2010 issue of Trusts & Estates is one example. Someday, perhaps, no translation will be needed.
 
2-22-2010 Update
 
An attorney pointed out to me that a suitability standard has to be objective to be workable in litigation. Fair enough. You can’t have consumers suing whenever they feel like it with a made-up story about what they would have done if they had only known something that wasn’t disclosed.
 
I’d settle for an empirically-based information set that has been found to cause decision changes. Regulators throughout the world are willing to set insurance policy reserves and risk-based capital at a defined threshold, such as 99.5% Value at Risk. A suitability standard could be set at a threshold such as 0.5% chance of causing a decision change.
 
The negotiated process of coming up with this information set would confirm that suitability standards are not really about making good decisions. They’re about feeling that you’ve accomplished something without really changing anything.

This Website Is For Financial Professionals Only


A Strategically Focused CE Curriculum

With classes approved for over a decade by the CFP Board, IWI, and NASBA, Advisors4Advisors CE classes are an optimal knowledge stream for CFP®, CIMA®, CPA, CPA/PFS®, CFA®, and other practitioners. It's not a grab bag of speakers willing to sponsor CE content. Nor is it a one-man CE course. It's a group of subject matter experts with amazing communication skills and a history of thought leadership that, together, give advisors a well-rounded knowledge system for running a professional practice ethically and intelligently.

CE Since October 2008

A4A CE classes for financial professionals began in October 2008, the week Lehman Bros. collapsed. Initially billed as “The Financial Crisis Webinar Series,” A4A connects advisors with authoritative sources on investing, tax, and financial planning, chosen by A4A Editor Andrew Gluck, a veteran financial reporter. A4A members get a stream of CE classes for an advisor who: 

  • holds a CFP®, CIMA®, CPA, CPA/PFS, CFA or other designation requiring CE annually 
  • values monthly CE classes by Fritz Meyer, Craig Israelsen, Bob Keebler, Frank Murtha, or Andrew Gluck
  • diversifies a core of client portfolios in low-expense funds
  • invests based on MPT and economic fundamentals
  • advises on tax and financial planning as well as investing
  • needs financial counseling skills
  • wants the Certified Financial Counselor™ designation 
  • is building a brand as a thought leader locally or in a niche
  • wants the facts when bad news breaks
  • wants CE aligned with a content marketing system
  • wants 24/7 access to CE on-demand
  • insists on objective evidenced-based tax and investment planning analysis
MEMBER REVIEWS 
William Desormeau, Jr.  
It is not possible for me to overstate the cumulative value that Craig, Bob and Fritz have added for over 10 years to my investment advisory practice, as well as for personal and family financial planning. A4A gets my highest recommendation
Lynn Najman, CFP®
I’ve subscribed to A4A since its inception, and always find it intellectually stimulating and on point. It’s one of the few CE solutions out there that doesn’t waste my time by pushing product or talking down to me.

PeteDeacon-CPA-CFP

Pete Deacon, CPA, CFP®
A4A has had a profound effect on my business. Since 2009, I’ve relied on the consistent messaging and updates to run my business successfully. Being able to present the information from Bob, Fritz, and Craig's ongoing CE webinars has been a significant benefit.

fredericMayersen-phd-cfp

Fredric Mayerson, MBA, PhD, CFP®
I've been a financial professional and professor of finance for 35 years and find Fritz Meyer and Robert Keebler to be among the most engaging, incredibly knowledgeable, and experienced presenters I’ve encountered. They deliver an extraordinary amount of information in an extremely interesting way — sequentially and developmentally, utilizing pedagogical tools and techniques that few possess.  A4A to is the most consistently excellent CE program available.  
Ron Roge, MS, CFP®
I’ve been attending A4A many years because the CE classes are outstanding, and my time is valuable. Though I have over 35 years of experience, I’m always learning something new on A4A. I attend fewer conferences now because the CE is generally not advanced. If you want to learn from the best, in a faster, easier, and less expensive way, I highly recommend A4A.

John R. Day, CPA/PFS®

I’ve been a member since 2011 and never miss the monthly webinars with Fritz Meyer. I appreciate Fritz’s independent views on the economy and markets and Bob Keebler keeps me updated on excellent tax planning ideas. A4A is a great value!

NormanPolitzinerCFP

Norman Politziner, CFP

I wouldn't miss a Fritz Meyer webinar unless my pants were on fire. I've relied on Andrew Gluck's knowledge systems --client communications and CE -- for two decades. It's simply the best solution for tax, financial, investment, and risk-management professionals.®   

Dan Hawley, CFP® 

A4A, for over a decade, has been a great resource for useful and accurate information and CE. A4A and Advisor Products are bargains for an advisory practice. 

KevinBrosious-CFP-CPA-PFS

Kevin Brosious, MBA, CFP®, CPA/PFS®

I get CPA CE credit and CFP credit for the webinars.  But not only that, the A4A content is terrific